Complex / Fraud / Cross-Border Investigation report

A Complex Investigation covers several targets at once: people, companies, domains and financial indicators across jurisdictions and languages. The engine follows the links between them recursively, and analysts test competing hypotheses, record contradictions and state confidence. Scope and price are agreed with you before collection starts.

Discuss an investigation See a sample

Who orders it

Fraud and investigations teams working a multi-party scheme
Law firms on cross-border disputes
Corporate security on threat actors with several personas
Investigation firms needing capacity on a large mandate

Questions it answers

How do these people, companies, domains and financial indicators connect, across borders, and what does the evidence support?

Are these entities connected, and through whom?
Which person sits behind this network of companies and domains?
What happened when, across which jurisdictions?
Which hypothesis does the evidence support, and which does it contradict?

Scope

Multiple people, companies and digital assets in one case
Recursive pivots across corporate, digital and financial indicators
Company registries in several jurisdictions
Research in the languages of the case
Cyber and infrastructure correlation where relevant
Alternative hypotheses, contradictions and intelligence gaps
Analyst assessment and reviewer sign-off

RoadmapChronological timeline section in the report

Not every source applies to every subject; the report shows what was checked and what was not.

Not included

Anything outside lawful, public or authorized sources
Covert human intelligence, surveillance or pretexting
Guaranteed attribution: findings carry stated confidence
Legal advice or expert-witness testimony unless separately agreed

Example table of contents

01Mandate and scope
02Executive intelligence assessment
03Entity resolution
04Key findings
05Entity and relationship graph
06Report-specific modules (corporate, financial, cyber)
07Contradictions and alternative hypotheses
08Intelligence gaps
09Analyst assessment and sign-off
10Evidence index and source log

Evidence and confidence

How is evidence verified?

Each finding carries its source, an Admiralty grade (source reliability A to F, credibility from corroboration), the retrieval time and a SHA-256 hash of the captured page. Inferred links are labelled as assessments with their confidence.

What stops a weak finding getting through?

QA rules block findings without evidence, universal negatives and speculative language, and an analyst signs the report off before release.

Read the methodology

Price and process

From $9,900

Starting price. Scope, jurisdictions and data-provider costs set the final figure, which is confirmed before collection starts.

1. Your organization is vetted before its first case.
2. You state the requirement, purpose and lawful basis; we agree scope and price.
3. Collection, analysis, QA and analyst sign-off.
4. Delivery: Scoped report with a relationship graph, hypotheses and confidence, signed off by an analyst.

Turnaround depends on scope and is agreed with the mandate.

Need this level of intelligence on a real case?

Runs on OSINTTotal Investigate. Published examples are on the samples page.

Discuss an investigation

Screen
Fast, repeatable intelligence screening of people and companies.
Investigate
Deep investigations across people, companies, assets and networks.
Cyber
Infrastructure, exposure and the people and companies behind it.

Sample reports Methodology Pricing Acceptable use